Systems Change Initiatives
Solutions in this category focus on addressing the infrastructure and support systems for interpreters and DDBHH (Deaf, DeafBlind, and Hard of Hearing) through efforts that involve state-level action, such as legislation or centralization by the state of Minnesota.
categories
Category A: Deaf, DeafBlind and Hard of Hearing (DDBHH) Advocacy
Category B: Systems Change Initiatives
Category C: Interpreter Referral Companies
Category D: Community Building for Interpreter Recruitment and Retention
Solutions in category
Create Centralized Website of Resources, Including a Directory of Interpreters and Specializations
Expand Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services Division (DHHSD) Grants
Complete Studies about DDBHH Communities and Interpreting Field
Require All Major Local News Services to Provide Picture-in-Picture Interpreters
Recognize Additional Specialty Areas of Interpreting
Support Business Development by Developing a Public State Payscale for Freelancers
Create a Central State Government Interpreting Services Office
Create Quality Specialist Position in State Government
Establish Licensure for Interpreters
Solution
For each solution within this category, respondents rated their level of support. The survey results are shown below from most popular to least popular, based on the combined level of support and strongly support. The visual breakdown is shown next to each solution. Click on the solution name to learn more in detail.
Image description: A set of stacked bar charts show the percentage of respondents are shown for the five categories from left to right: Strongly Oppose (Dark Red), Oppose (Light Red), Neutral (Yellow), Support (Light Blue), and Strongly Support (Dark Blue). The percentages are shown under each bar.
Strongly Oppose
Oppose
Neutral
Support
Strongly Support
Strongly Oppose: 0%, Oppose: 1%, Neutral: 9%, Support: 35%, Strongly Support: 54%
Strongly Oppose: 0%, Oppose: 3%, Neutral: 11%, Support: 33%, Strongly Support: 53%
Strongly Oppose: 0%, Oppose: 4%, Neutral: 16%, Support: 44%, Strongly Support: 36%
Strongly Oppose: 1%, Oppose: 5%, Neutral: 16%, Support: 34%, Strongly Support: 44%
Strongly Oppose: 0%, Oppose: 2%, Neutral: 24%, Support: 46%, Strongly Support: 28%
Strongly Oppose: 1%, Oppose: 12%, Neutral: 28%, Support: 37%, Strongly Support: 23%
Strongly Oppose: 5%, Oppose: 13%, Neutral: 25%, Support: 28%, Strongly Support: 28%
Strongly Oppose: 4%, Oppose: 8%, Neutral: 32%, Support: 31%, Strongly Support: 26%
Strongly Oppose: 12%, Oppose: 15%, Neutral: 27%, Support: 28%, Strongly Support: 18%
Strongly Oppose: 9%, Oppose: 17%, Neutral: 33%, Support: 25%, Strongly Support: 17%
Strongly Oppose: 10%, Oppose: 17%, Neutral: 37%, Support: 23%, Strongly Support: 13%
Strongly Oppose: 19%, Oppose: 21%, Neutral: 32%, Support: 14%, Strongly Support: 15%